Home / Mindsets / Man on the Moon
Mindsets

Man on the Moon

A destination that is specific, verifiable, dated and beyond your current method — and the constraint clause that stops you arriving in a state you would not want.

In May 1961, President Kennedy told Congress the United States should commit itself, before the decade was out, to landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. The technology to do it did not exist. That is not a flaw in the goal — it is the entire mechanism.

Most business goals fail the opposite way round. They are achievable with the current method, which means they change nothing, and they are vague enough that nobody could ever prove they were missed. A moon goal is specific, verifiable, dated and beyond what you know how to do today.

What makes a goal a moon goal?

Four things, and it needs all four.

Then there is the clause almost everybody drops: and returning him safely to the Earth. Kennedy did not set a goal of reaching the Moon. He set a goal of reaching it without killing the crew, which is a materially harder problem and rules out a whole category of solutions that would otherwise have looked efficient.

Your version of that clause is the constraint that stops you hitting the number in a way that wrecks something you care about. Ten million in revenue is not a moon goal. Ten million with the margin intact, the founding team still here and you not in the building five days a week is a moon goal, because it closes off the shortcuts.

Why does an owner need one?

The value is not motivation. Motivation is not in short supply in most owner-managed businesses; direction is. A moon goal earns its keep because it makes hundreds of small decisions obvious, and those decisions are where the year is actually spent.

Without a destination, every opportunity looks roughly as attractive as every other one. A profitable job that pulls you into a market you do not want to be in scores the same as a job that builds the thing you are trying to build. So you take both, and three years later you have a busy business with no shape to it and no story a buyer would pay for.

With a destination, most opportunities answer themselves in about eight seconds. That is the return: not inspiration, but speed and consistency of decisions taken by people who are not in the room with you.

It is also the only honest way to size the gap. Owners who have never fixed a destination tend to describe the business as roughly on track — and on track to nowhere in particular is a very easy standard to meet. Put a number and a date on the wall and the gap becomes arithmetic, which is a great deal easier to work with than a feeling that things could probably be better.

A worked example

Illustrative. A manufacturer turning over £4.2m, running about seven per cent net, so roughly £294,000, with an owner working fifty-five hour weeks and signing off every quote.

The moon goal, written with a real date on the wall — call it year five here: £10m of revenue at twelve per cent net, with the business running four days a week without me. That is roughly nineteen per cent compound growth for five years, and twelve per cent of £10m is £1.2m — four times today’s profit.

Now back-cast it. To be at £10m in year five you need to be near £6m by the end of year three. Six million does not come out of one shift on the current plant, so the second shift or the second site is a decision made in year one, not discovered in year four. Twelve per cent net at that scale needs gross margin somewhere near thirty-eight per cent against today’s thirty-two, which means the pricing work starts now. And “without me” means an operations director hired and properly bedded in by the middle of year three — which means recruiting in year two, which means affording it in year two.

Here is the goal doing its real job. In March, a £180,000 one-off contract appears at eighteen per cent gross margin that would occupy the main line for five months. Without the moon goal it is a good month. With it, it is an obvious no: it consumes the capacity you need for margin work, teaches the team that low-margin volume is welcome, and moves you no closer to anything.

Figures illustrative, decision entirely real. A destination does not make you work harder. It makes a certain kind of attractive, profitable, off-strategy work easy to turn down — and turning that work down is most of what strategy actually is.

How to set one this week

  1. Pick the date first. Far enough out that the current method genuinely cannot deliver it, close enough that you will personally still be running the business. Three to five years is usually the range.
  2. Write it in one sentence with a number and a date. If it needs a paragraph, it is a strategy document, not a destination. If it has no number, nobody will ever know whether you arrived.
  3. Add your “returning him safely” clause. The condition that rules out winning ugly: margin, the team, your health, the ownership — whatever you are not prepared to spend.
  4. Back-cast to three checkpoints. Where the business must be at year one, at the midpoint and at the finish. These are not targets, they are proof that the arithmetic works.
  5. Name the thing that has to be true and is not. A capability, a person, a system, a market. Usually there are two or three. Those are your projects; everything else is maintenance.
  6. Say it out loud every month. A destination mentioned twice a year is wallpaper. It only filters decisions if the team can repeat it without looking it up.

The mistake most owners make

They set a big round number and think the job is done. A number with no constraint attached invites the fastest route, which is nearly always the one that damages the business: buy revenue, discount hard, hire in a panic, take on clients you will resent. You get to the Moon with a dead crew.

The second mistake is the private moon goal. The owner has one, has had it for years, and has never said it out loud to the people who would have to build it — then is quietly disappointed that nobody is pulling in that direction. Nobody is pulling in that direction because nobody knows what it is.

The third is picking a destination that is somebody else’s. Ten million because ten million sounds like a proper business. If the goal does not survive the question “and what would that actually change about your life?”, it will not survive year two either.

Questions to ask yourself

This is the starting point of strategy, and it is where Business Coaching begins. Strategy is only a set of choices about how to get somewhere, so a business without a destination cannot really have one. It has preferences, and preferences change every time the phone rings.

Where this goes next

Where this goes next.

A destination is only useful if it changes what you say yes to. These are the two habits that make it bite.

Coaching

Business Coaching

A destination is the start of strategy, not the end of it. Business coaching turns it into checkpoints, the two or three projects that carry it, and a quarterly rhythm.

Explore Business Coaching
Mindset

Making Decisions

One-way doors and two-way doors — how fast to decide once you know where you are heading.

Read the mindset
Mindset

Level 5 Leadership

Ambition pointed at the company rather than at yourself, and what that does to the value of the business.

Read the mindset

Get the next one in your inbox

One practical, plain-English guide for business owners each week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.

Common questions

What makes a moon goal different from an ordinary target?

Four things, and it needs all four. It is specific, so everybody pictures the same thing. It is verifiable, so on the day in question you either did it or you did not, and no amount of narrative changes the answer. It is dated. And it is beyond the current method, meaning you cannot get there by doing more of what you already do. Most business goals fail the opposite way round: they are achievable with today’s method, which means they change nothing, and they are vague enough that nobody could ever prove they were missed. A target you can hit by working slightly harder is a forecast, not a destination.

What is the ‘returning him safely’ clause and why does it matter?

Kennedy did not set a goal of reaching the Moon. He set a goal of reaching it and returning the crew safely to the Earth, which is a materially harder problem and rules out a whole category of solutions that would otherwise have looked efficient. Your version is the constraint that stops you hitting the number in a way that wrecks something you care about. Ten million in revenue is not a moon goal. Ten million with the margin intact, the founding team still here and you not in the building five days a week is a moon goal, because it closes off the shortcuts — discounting hard, panic hiring, and taking on clients you will resent.

How far out should the date be?

Far enough that your current method genuinely cannot deliver it, close enough that you will personally still be running the business when it arrives. Three to five years is usually the range. Shorter than that and you will set something you can reach by working slightly harder, which changes nothing about how you decide. Longer and it stops filtering this month’s choices, which is the entire point of having one. Then back-cast to three checkpoints — where the business must be at year one, at the midpoint and at the finish. Those are not targets. They are proof that the arithmetic works before you commit anybody to it.

Fix the destination, then work back — start with a conversation.

Book a Discovery Call
Chat with us on WhatsApp