The Future Self exercise is backwards planning. You describe a specific person three years out in enough detail that their Tuesday is real, then work back to what they must already have decided for that Tuesday to be possible. It runs in the opposite direction to almost all business planning, which starts from today and adds — this year plus ten per cent, the same shape, the same people, a bit more of it.
That is why so many three-year plans are really one-year plans repeated, and why they rarely change what anybody does on Monday. Forward planning is limited by what you can currently afford and currently believe. Backwards planning asks a different question, and it is a question with dates and names in it.
What the exercise actually is
The future self has to be a person, not a number. £3m of turnover is not a future self. A future self is what that owner’s Tuesday looks like: who they see, what lands in their inbox, what they no longer touch, who makes the decisions they used to make, what they say no to without thinking about it, and what the business is worth to somebody else.
Once the person is specific, the question changes from “what should we aim for” to “what did she have to have decided by year two for this to be true”. That is answerable this week.
There is a simple test of whether you have described a real future self or a mood board. Could somebody else read your page and tell you, without asking, what you would have to stop doing in the next six months? If not, it is not specific enough yet. The detail is not decoration — the detail is what converts into decisions.
Why it matters to an owner
Forward planning inherits today’s constraints, including the ones that are about to disappear. You cannot afford an operations manager today, so the plan built from today does not contain one, so in three years you are still the operations manager. A constraint that was true in January has quietly written the next three years.
The second reason is that owners systematically under-decide. The decisions that only pay back over years — hiring above yourself, documenting the work, repositioning on price — are precisely the ones that never feel urgent. A three-year frame is the only frame in which they look obvious rather than expensive.
The third is more human. Most of us treat our future self a little like a colleague we are quietly dumping work on. We hand them the difficult conversation, the systems project and the two-week holiday, on the assumption that they will somehow have more time, more staff and more nerve than we do. Meeting them properly, in detail, tends to end that arrangement.
A worked example
Illustrative. The owner of a £1.5m building services firm who still quotes every job herself. Planning forward gives next year at £1.65m, the same team plus one, and her still quoting every job — because quoting is what generates the work and there is nobody else who can do it. Nothing structural changes, because nothing structural is affordable this year.
Now the future self. Three years out: £3m, three crews, she does not price jobs, she works four days, and the business could be sold without the buyer worrying that the value walks out with her. Work backwards from that Tuesday. For her not to be quoting in year three, an estimator has to be in post and trusted by the middle of year two, which means recruited in year two on a salary the business must be earning by then. For an estimator to be effective, the quoting method has to exist outside her head, which means it must be documented in year one. For it to be documented, someone has to record how she actually prices work, including the judgement calls she makes without noticing. That is a 90-day job, and it starts with recording the next ten quotes and writing down why each number was what it was.
The three-year goal was ambitious and vague. The 90-day action it produces is small and precise, and this quarter gets spent on it rather than on another £1.65m version of the same year.
How to use it this week
- Write their Tuesday in the present tense. One page, three years out, in detail. What time it starts, what is in the diary, who runs the meeting, what you are not in. Present tense matters, because the future tense keeps it hypothetical.
- List five things they no longer do. Usually more revealing than the list of what they do. Everything on it is a delegation or a systems project with a date attached.
- Work back to year two, then year one. For each element of that Tuesday, ask what had to be true twelve months earlier. Keep going until you hit something you could start this quarter.
- Turn it into three dated decisions. Not aims. Decisions, with a month against each: when you hire, when you reprice, when you stop doing the thing you are best at.
- Check what you are offloading to them. Write the list of things you are assuming your future self will handle, and move at least one of them into this quarter.
- Put it where you will see it. A page in a drawer changes nothing. Read it before the quarterly plan, and again before any decision that commits you for more than a year.
The commonest failure is writing a fantasy instead of a person: no trade-offs, no constraints, no unpleasant decisions, just a bigger version of now with a better car. A useful future self has losses in it — the thing you gave up, the person you had to move on, the type of work you stopped taking. If the description contains no losses, you have written an advert rather than a plan.
Questions to ask yourself
- Out of 10, how different is the owner in your three-year plan from the one reading this? If the answer is low, you have forecast rather than planned.
- What are you quietly assuming your future self will be brave enough to do, that you are not doing now?
- What decision, made this quarter rather than in two years, would change the most about that Tuesday?
- Who would have to be in the business, and what would they have to be trusted with, for you to be out of the middle of it?
Where this fits in coaching
Future Self sits in the self-leadership half of our personal coaching, because it is not really a planning tool. It is the thing that makes planning honest, by turning a set of ambitions into a short list of decisions with your name and a date on them. Read it with the Goldilocks target, which is how to size the numbers so they are stretching rather than fictional, and The 5 A’s of Change, which is what happens to those decisions once you start acting on them.
Get the next one in your inbox
One practical, plain-English guide for business owners each week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
Frequently asked questions
Why three years rather than one or ten?
Twelve months out is today with a haircut. It inherits every constraint you have now, including the ones about to disappear, so the plan simply reflects what you already believe is possible. Ten years is far enough away that nobody can name the people involved, which makes it pleasant and useless. Three years is the span where current constraints stop being decisive — you can afford a hire in year two that you cannot afford this month — while the detail stays concrete enough to work backwards from. If in doubt, err towards three and revisit the page every quarter.
What if my future self looks unrealistic on paper?
Test it by working backwards rather than by arguing about the destination. Take each element of that Tuesday and ask what had to be true twelve months earlier, then twelve months before that. If the chain reaches something you could genuinely start this quarter, the picture is ambitious rather than unrealistic. If every path runs into a step nobody could take, the picture needs adjusting, and it is far better to find that out now than in year two. Backwards planning is the honest test, and it tends to expose a fantasy faster than any discussion of the numbers.
How is this different from setting a three-year goal?
A goal is a result. This exercise produces decisions, which is a different output. “Three million and four days a week” tells you nothing about what to do in April; describing the person who runs that business tells you an estimator must be trusted by the middle of year two, which means recruited in year two, which means the quoting method must be documented this year, which means recording the next ten quotes. Plans that list results without decisions are wishes with a spreadsheet attached. The detail is what converts ambition into something with a date on it.